Impact of Postoperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Surgical Site Infections Rates After Mastectomy with Drains but Without Immediate Reconstruction: A Multicenter, Double-Blinded, Randomized Control Superiority Trial.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the use of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) after mastectomy with indwelling drains. We explored the utility of continued PAP in reducing surgical site infection (SSI) rates after mastectomy without immediate reconstruction and with indwelling drains. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicenter, two-armed, randomized control superiority trial was conducted in Pakistan. We enrolled all consenting adult patients undergoing mastectomy without immediate reconstruction. All patients received a single preoperative dose of cephalexin within 60 min of incision, and postoperatively were randomized to receive either continued PAP using cephalexin (intervention) or a placebo (control) for the duration of indwelling, closed-suction drains. The primary outcome was the development of SSI within 30 days and 90 days postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included study-drug-associated adverse events. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed using multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: A total of 369 patients, 180 (48.8%) in the intervention group and 189 (51.2%) in the control group, were included in the final analysis. Overall cumulative SSI rates were 3.5% at 30 days and 4.6% at 90 days postoperatively. PAP was not associated with SSI reduction at 30 (hazard ratio, HR 1.666 [95% confidence interval CI 0.515-5.385]) or 90 (1.575 [0.558-4.448]) days postoperatively, or with study-drug-associated adverse effects (0.529 [0.196-1.428]). CONCLUSIONS: Continuing antibiotic prophylaxis for the duration of indwelling drains after mastectomy without immediate reconstruction offers no additional benefit in terms of SSI reduction. There is a need to update existing guidelines to provide clearer recommendations regarding use of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis after mastectomy in the setting of indwelling drains.

Comparative Evaluation of Surface Roughness of Porcelain Fused to Metal and Stainless-Steel Crown Following Ultrasonic and Hand Scaling: A Comparative Study.

Introduction Surface roughness encourages plaque retention and causes mechanical, chemical, and biological irritation to surrounding soft tissues. Hence, a smooth surface of restoration is preferred for optimal plaque control and the health of the periodontium. Aim The aim is to evaluate and compare the surface roughness of porcelain fused to metal and stainless-steel crowns following ultrasonic and hand scaling techniques. Material and methods An in-vitro study was conducted on 30 porcelain fused to metal crowns and 30 stainless-steel crowns. Their surface roughness following instrumentation was evaluated by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and profilometry. Results Evaluation by profilometry indicated that porcelain fused to metal following ultrasonic instrumentation has a statistically more significant surface roughness and indentation as compared to hand scaling with p-values < 0.05. Conclusion The surface roughness of any restoration may act as a plaque retentive factor which would affect the health of the periodontium. Ultrasonic scaling is capable of creating roughness to a more extent as compared to hand scaling and porcelain fused to the metal type of restorations is more vulnerable to roughness.

Bloch Sulzberger syndrome (Incontinentia Pigmenti): a rare case report with dental defects.

Incontinentia Pigmenti (IP) is a multisystem genodermatosis characterized by cutaneous, neurologic, ophthalmologic, and dental abnormalities. This article reports the clinical features and management of a 4-year-old girl diagnosed with IP.

Colposcopy - a novel diagnostic technique for oral mucosal lesions.

The incidence of premalignant lesions and oral cancers is steadily increasing globally. In spite of advancement in early detection, there is increased mortality and morbidity related to oral cancers. The diagnosis of a dysplastic premalignant lesion of the oral mucosa cannot be based solely on clinical findings. Therefore histologic evaluation of a representative biopsy specimen is necessary. Therefore, the selection for a biopsy site is highly significant. In this article, we present a current review of the colposcope and oral application of the colposcopy technique and its use as an adjunct in the early diagnosis of premalignant and malignant lesions of the oral mucosa. We stress upon the fact that colposcopy (direct oral microscopy) of oral mucosal lesions helps in selecting more representative sites for biopsy than routine clinical examination alone. Because of its precision, versatility, ease of use, and being a non-invasive technique, colposcopy might prove to be a useful step toward continuing to learn and improve the care for our patients.